Catoctin/Fauquier contact

Catoctin/Fauquier contact
Power washing a quarry block near Aldie, VA that preserves a soft sediment contact of the Fauquier Formation cap carbonate and pillow basalt of the Catoctin Formation.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Shale Reservoirs - Natural Gas Generation & Extraction


Shale is a fine-grained, laminated sedimentary rock composed of clay- and silt-sized sediments typically deposited in low-energy environments, along with algal-, plant- and animal-derived organic matter.  Formation of natural gas within shale primarily occurs via thermogenic degradation (cracking) of organic material (kerogen) through time, although biogenic production can also occur.  As the organic-rich shale rocks are buried and subjected to increasing pressures and temperatures (at a typical geothermal gradient of 30oC/km), breakdown of organic matter to petroleum hydrocarbons begins to occur.  The oil generation window occurs at approximately 60-120oC (2-4km depth), while the gas generation window occurs at 100-200+oC (3-6km depth).  The thermal maturity of the shale rock, generally measured by vitrinite reflectance (%Ro), is thus used to determine the type and quantity of hydrocarbons present.  Vintrinite, composed of cellulose and lignin, is a common organic constituent in coal and woody kerogen that has a vitreous luster and characteristic reflectance when heated.  Gas-generating shale rock has typical % Ro values ranging from 1.5-3.0%, where as oil generation predominantly occurs in sources rocks with a <1.5% Ro.


          Figure 1. Summary of the oil and gas formation process.

In addition to the thermal maturity of the source rock, the volume of produced gas is also dependent on the source of the organic matter and overall TOC content.  Kerogen is the insoluble portion of organic matter that is not extractable using organic solvents (versus bitumen).  There are four main types of kerogen, differentiated by their composition.  Type III, composed of woody terrestrial source material, is typically known to generate gas.  Globally averaged organic contents of shale are estimated to range between 2-10% carbonaceous material, with higher percentages being indicative of deposition under anoxic, reducing environments.  In general, the higher the TOC content within shale, the higher the probability of finding economically viable quantities of gas.
Once generated, natural gases are stored in natural fractures and pores between individual shale grains, and are also adsorbed onto the surfaces of, and also pores within, kerogen and clay particles.  Due to shale’s extremely low porosity and matrix permeability (< 1 millidarcy, mD), the organic-rich “black shales” can serve as both source rock and reservoir, trapping large estimated quantities of natural gas. 


                                  


                             Figure 2. Conventional and unconventional petroleum reservoirs.

 It is also this characteristic of shale structure that makes extraction of gas difficult and uneconomical, and thus why shale has been historically viewed as an “unconventional” gas resource.  However, current technological advances in horizontal drilling and fracture stimulation technology (ie: hydraulic fracturing) have enhanced access to natural fractures within shale and successfully increased matrix permeability, allowing the extraction of shale gas to become more economically viable energy.
Numerous questions and concerns are arising regarding the environmental effects of such drilling and extraction practices, with particular concern of the fluids used in hydraulic fracturing.  What is the exact composition of the “hydrofrack” fluids? What are the geochemical reactions of the fluids interacting with the shale?  What will happen to the integrity of the shale reservoir and surrounding rock formations over time?  While residual fluids left in the shale reservoir become trapped within fractures and pore spaces, ultimately inhibiting further natural gas generation or extraction over time?
My work ultimately aims to determine the chemical and physical interactions of different types of fracking fluids (water-based vs. CO2-based) on shale rock formations of varying TOC and carbonate contents, thermal maturity and brittleness index, and thus determine their impact on gas recovery efficiency.  A more complete and quantitative understanding of the impacts of hydraulic fracturing fluids in shale reservoirs is imperative if we are to continue to depend on natural gas as a major energy resource.


References:

Arthur, J.Daniel, Bohm, Brian, and Layne, Mark, 2008.  Hydraulic Fracturing Considerations for Natural Gas Wells of the Marcellus Shale.Ground Water Protection Council Annual Forum.

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Fossil Energy and National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2009.  Modern Shale Gas Development in the United States: A Primer.  DE-FG26-04NT15455.3-5.

7 comments:

  1. Your article is very instructive and easy to understand. Right now in China-the world's factory, the government and the big oil companies in China are VERY eager to obtain the technical skills of the shale gas exploration and development! Large amount of money has been out in this research field! As far as I know, recently there are several academic conferences on shale gas prepared to be held in Chinese institute and universities. So I think your research is very important and is expected to bring considerable benefits to the oil companies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was very easy to read - you kept it simple enough without 'dumbing down' your science. This sounds very interesting and I'm excited to see how your research progresses!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This was little heavy on the technical facts for the average reader. I would suggest adding a picture of shale for non-geologists. I really like the second to last paragraph.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It might be helpful to focus on your project first, before going into the formation of oil and gas. Start with why understanding fracking is important, then provide the rest of the information as background.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Definitely too technical, although I like how you sometimes offered less technical synonyms (i.e. thermogenic degradation (cracking), in the first paragraph). I would consider replacing the technical terms altogether, rather than simplifying them in parentheses. And if you are trying to grab a reader's attention, starting with the definition of "shale" is not the way to go.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The intro is way to technical, but the science is great. I like the paragraphs with the questions. It outlines the types of questions that need to be answered before hydrofracture can be used as a major source of petroleum. I like the comparison / contrast between conventional oil extraction methods and extraction from gas rich shale.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The title is rather dull but the topic has so much potential and relevance to the average reader. Restructuring the blog to get the readers attention earlier would be a good change.

    ReplyDelete