What can rock deformation do for you? Maybe turn your car exhaust into limestone!
Climate
change is one of the most talked about issues of the last two and a half
decades. Though its existence is
now generally accepted, debates about its causes, extent and what’s to be done
continue to rage; however, it has become clear that one major cause of climate
change is increased levels of carbon dioxide gas in the atmosphere. Diverse solutions have been proposed, from
massive reforestation efforts to iron-seeding the oceans to stimulate algal
blooms, all of which have encountered resistance from various environmental
and/or industrial groups.
![]() | ||||||||||
| Industrial processes release carbon dioxide and other byproducts into the atmosphere. |
Reservoir sequestration involves
storing carbon dioxide as a gas trapped in non-economic coal seams or dissolved
in non-potable aquifers. This
method is popular because it is essentially already in use by the hydrocarbon
drilling industry in the form of enhanced oil recovery. Several notable drawbacks include
contamination of potable aquifers, acidification of groundwater and concomitant
changes in the mechanical behavior of reservoir rocks and catastrophic
degassing and asphyxiation.
Mineralization takes advantage of
natural reactions of minerals from deep within the earth with carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere to form stable carbonate rocks. The main benefit of this method is that it is safe. The carbon dioxide gets stored as stable carbonate rocks, and is therefore relatively
static. The drawbacks of this
method are mostly cost related.
![]() |
| Carbonate minerals precipitated in old mantle rock. |
However, there may be another way.
The reaction of carbon dioxide with
mafic minerals actually releases energy in the form of heat, so once initiated the reaction can be
self-sustaining. The reaction also
has a positive change in volume. A runaway positive volume change reaction in a confined space is usually referred to by another name: a bomb.
If we can harness this power of this natural bomb to fracture the rocks, creating pathways for fluid flow and exposing fresh reactive material, we could
maintain a self-heating, self-pulverizing in-situ carbon dump. BAM!
In our
lab, we have been designing an apparatus to run carbon dioxide-rich fluids
through reactive materials during active deformation and monitor the changes in
mechanical and transport property behavior. We plan to test different pressure and temperature regimes
to see if we can constrain under which conditions this reaction driven cracking
might take place. This is still a
new area of research, so there is much to learn. The myriad possibilities make it truly exciting science!First image from the Library of Congress.
Second image from http://cain.ice.ucdavis.edu/repository/SerpWebSoilPics.htm


Thank you for your introductions on the carbon sequestration and mineralization. This research field is new and hot.
ReplyDeleteI am curious that:
what mafic and ultramafic minerals do you normally use for C mineralization reaction?
Is this reaction process similar with the natural process of carbonate rock formation?
This is interesting!! Good introduction about climate change an CO2 sequestration, with good use of links...it flows well. I would suggest adding an image/metaphor about the reaction of CO2 with the minerals.
ReplyDeleteI like the multiple links embedded into the article - and now I know about google ngram - thanks!
ReplyDeleteWell written blog. I liked all the links but I would suggest adding one image to help grab attention and give the reader something visual to tie the information to.
ReplyDeleteVery well written. The intro is excellent for grabbing the reader. Some of the vocabulary boarders on the technical, especially towards the end. And I know this is repetitive: the links are great, but add some figures!
ReplyDeleteAlso, why puppies? Why not kittens? ;-)
I like it. The only thing that I would change is the drawbacks section. You should mention that these dangers have been proposed to occur as a result of carbon sequestration but that they are unlikely. The way the article reads, these things sound like certainties, and I don't think people would go for carbon sequestration if they run a risk of asphyxiating.
ReplyDelete