Catoctin/Fauquier contact

Catoctin/Fauquier contact
Power washing a quarry block near Aldie, VA that preserves a soft sediment contact of the Fauquier Formation cap carbonate and pillow basalt of the Catoctin Formation.

Thursday, February 2, 2012

The Melt Redemption


The spreading center axis of a mid-ocean ridge is always believed to be the only exit for the upwelling melts beneath it to erupt. However, recent observations suggest that those seemingly abiding melts have probably already found a secret passage to escape. Throughout the global mid-ocean ridge system, mid-ocean ridges are offset by transform faults. These transform faults, with efficient conductive cooling, may produce a thickened lithosphere that directs melts away, but recent research showed that, the thickened crust along transform faults might indicate efficient melt extraction toward transforms.

Laura and Laurent (2011) apply a 3D model of melt migration and extraction to investigate the unusual thickened crust along an oceanic transform at fast spreading ridges, and suggest that a melt extraction zone (MEZ) should be responsible for the melt redemption. Melt migration at mid-ocean ridge system can be modeled by a 2-D process with two steps: (1) vertical upwelling under buoyancy within the asthenosphere; (2) lateral migration along a low-permeability boundary (permeability barrier) inclined towards the ridge axis within the thermal lithosphere. However, in 3-D, the thermomechanical  structure of the transform will affect the melt pathway to the ridge axis and result in thickened crust. Laura and Laurent solve 3-D model based on a thermal structure that incorporates rheological feedbacks associated with brittle deformation and hydrothermal cooling, and emphasize the potential structural controls on melt extraction. Their results show that an MEZ, interpreted as structural damage such as faults and dikes, intersects the permeability barrier, redistributes excess ridge crust to the transform domain, and accounts well for the unusual crustal thickness at intermediate and fast slipping transform faults observed.
Conceptual geometry of melt extraction zone (MEZ) (A) ssociated with a fast-spreading mid-ocean ridge, (B) associated with a transform fault.
(A) Isoviscous model results for crustal thickness for the simplified ridge-transform cases and varying the distance of lateral extraction; (B) schematic representation of crustal accretion at ridge segments with no shunting; (C) Schematic representation of crustal redistribution into the transform domain when shunting is allowed.

However, at ridges with slow and ultraslow spreading rate, no thickened crust has been observed along transform faults. Thus, more questions emerge. If there is any MEZ around slow to ultraslow slipping transform? What prevents these MEZs from acting efficiently? What’s the relationship between the depths of MEZ & permeability barrier and the spreading rate? My research will be focusing on these questions and I will be modeling the mid-ocean ridge systems with different spreading rate, and finally find out the reasons for the different crustal thicknesses among transform faults with different slipping rates.

Reference

Hebert, L. B., and L. G. J. Montési (2011), Melt extraction pathways at seg- mented oceanic ridges: Application to the East Pacific Rise at the Siqueiros transform, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L11306, doi:10.1029/2011GL047206.

8 comments:

  1. Interesting work, but I think it's a little too technical for the average reader. I would suggest opening with why your work is important, and also try to explain any "scientific" information you include...i.e. define mid-ocean ridges and transform faults (maybe with more pictures?).

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you cite Laura and Laurent's paper, use their last names, like in the reference section. Putting "Laura and Laurent (2011)" is a little confusing if the person reading your article does not know their first names.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like the title of this blog. Geophysics is difficult for me....You must have a good knowledge of math and physics. Cool~

    ReplyDelete
  4. Try to find something to relate melt extraction to a general reader. Volcanism is a very exciting process, maybe you could describe a submarine eruption and then ask where all that lava came from.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think that defining terms a little bit more would be really useful. I agree with Katherine that is it better to use last names for Laura and Laurent

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Palma. The current opening sentences might catch the eye of someone who is used to reading about melt extraction, but it does not appeal to the casual science reader. I would suggest opening up with a sentence about why melting at mid-ocean ridges is important. Also, make sure you use last names when you cite people (e.g. Hebert and Montesi vs. Laura and Laurent). I look forward to reading more about this topic.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Love the title. The blog was very well written for somebody interested in the topic, maybe too technical for a casual reader. The top figure is eye-catching whereas the second figure is rather difficult to understand. I would recommend adding an exciting picture of a mid-ocean ridge, possibly even a satellite image.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with the other comments that suggest your blog was a little too technical for the average reader. Possibly explaining fome more of the terms would be helpful.

    ReplyDelete