Catoctin/Fauquier contact

Catoctin/Fauquier contact
Power washing a quarry block near Aldie, VA that preserves a soft sediment contact of the Fauquier Formation cap carbonate and pillow basalt of the Catoctin Formation.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

JOURNEY THROUGH TIME WITHOUT OXYGEN or HOW FAR IT CAN BE TO GET DEEP KNOWLEDGE

             
As everybody knows, oxygen is an essential gas both for plants and human or animals to live. “Is it so important to know?” – maybe someone asks. Really, YES, because if without food human can live about 1 month, without water up to 1 week but without oxygen just 5 minutes. So, our dependence on oxygen makes to think about its distribution in air and causes of its appearance in an atmosphere. “Is it important to know why oxygen appears?” – maybe asks other body. Apparently, yes, because knowing reasons of oxygen inception we can predict its future and naturally fortune of mankind. 
As history of Earth numbers 4,6 billions years scientists need to travel through time using records (sedimentary and volcanic rocks) remained from deep time to understand processes occurred on the Earth’s surface. For this purpose in summertime 2007 a group of people set off for a time travel called FAR-DEEP (The Fennoscandia Arctic Russia - Drilling Early Earth Project) in Arctic Russia as place where records are well-preserved. This journey was conceived by Professor Victor A. Melezhik from Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim and University of Bergen. The main idea was to understand processes and events which occurred during the Archean- Palaeoproterozoic (AR-PR) transition period (2,500-2,000 million years ago (Ma)) when as believed the oxygen level was dramatically increased. On the Figure 1 you can see places of drilling where volcanic-sedimentary consequences are presented. This is Murmansk region and Karelia located on the Fennoscandian shield where summer is mostly like winter in Washington, DC. Latitudes of these regions equal to latitudes of Alaska in the USA and geologists needed to not only survive but work very hard to get core material (Figure 2).
Well, FAR-DEEP fieldwork started and finished in 2007, where I also took part for 2.5 months to carry out the documentation of the core. There was a great experience of fieldwork and a collective collaboration. During the fieldwork stage our group faced many difficulties needed to be overcome. We worked 7/24 in our field camp (Figure 3) to receive the core material and if your turn was to work at night be prepared to fight with unsparing wind and perishing cold.


  Even change the place was a big trouble because of absent of a road and slash. Eventually 15 holes were drilled to get 3650 meters core what sounds like a distance between the Lincoln Memorial and the US Capitol in DC but reflects 500 million years as 1/9 part of the all Earth’s history. After summer 2007 the core was brought to Trondheim for further sampling among collaborators and multidisciplinary studying.
During those 500 millions years many events and changes occurred in and on the Earth. Among them are:
1.           Global rifting (simply said huge cracks in the ground with the size of more then New York state) with the worldwide spread LIP (Large Igneous provinces) related with the richest deposits of copper, nickel, chromium, platinum etc.
2.       The GOE (Great Oxidation Event) when oxygen changed from almost 0% to 1% of present atmospheric level (now the oxygen concentration is 21%) that means that oxygen is presented in the atmosphere just for half of its history. And question is: “What trigger was to make oxygen to appear?”
3.             Signatures of the first petroleum generation (so-called Shunga Event). Petroleum which we use for human needs (e.g. plastic, gasoline, clothes and even cosmetics) and which price is a crucial factor in current economy as large deposits appeared about 600 million years ago but scientists found its trace 2,000 million years ago.
            Picture 4 represents other global events which like a mystery occurred at the same time near AR-PR boundary. Scientists want to understand which one was a cause and which one was a consequence.   
Figure 4. δ13C - time plot with main events happened at Palaeproterozoic time
          The collaborators involved in the project are from many countries (Russia, the USA, Norway, Germany, Scotland etc.) and they are doing research ranging from palaebiology to geochronology. Currently, the core samples are analyzing and comparing with similar succession from Gabon.
           Here are some links and references about this challenging Project:
Official page of the FAR-DEEP
Melezhik, V.A., Fallick, A.E., Hanski, E.J., Kump, L.R., Lepland, A., Prave, A.R., and Strauss, H., 2005. Emergence of the aerobic biosphere during the Archean-Proterozoic transition: Challenges of future research. Geol. Soc. Am. Today, 15:4–11. full text of the paper

10 comments:

  1. Thank you for the information you provide in this article! I am very interested in this deep drilling project! In the blog, you mentioned you did the Fe-minerals research, can you give us some details about that? Does it refer to iron speciation analyses?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is good that my post is useful. About my Fe-minerals research: it was mineralogical study with distinguishing of different phases of Fe-ore-minerals related to different processes. Not iron speciation analyses as I know it now.

      Delete
  2. This seems like a really interesting topic! Good job is sharing your interest! It seems like there is a lot of information that you want to convey in your second paragraph. I think that breaking it up into shorter sentences would make it easier to follow though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Very interesting work you were involved in. I like that you mention what the main idea was in the beginning. But when you talk about the specific work you did with Fe minerals, I would suggest including a sentence about the significance of your work to the "bigger picture"...why will your results be important?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really enjoyed reading this! Would you be able to put in another image or two?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The info about the FAR-DEEP project is interesting, but I'd like to hear more about the specific work you did. What did you do with the iron-bearing minerals and how does it relate to the larger goals of the project?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wouldn't use acronyms in the title of a general audience science article. Make sure you proofread. You need to establish exigence early on in your article. Needs figures!

    ReplyDelete
  7. It would be nice if there were some more images in the blog itself. Maybe include a map to show where the FAR-DEEP drilling occurred. You may want to describe each of the topics in the second paragraph,it might be helpful for the readers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I too thought your work seems very interesting. I also agree that a few more figures in the actual blog would be nice.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you all for comments. I really appreciate it. Big Russian SPASIBO. ;)

    ReplyDelete