What is the geodynamo, anyway?
![]() |
| A depiction of Earth's magnetic field. Blue lines represent magnetic field lines. Figure credit: Hyperphysics |
Sounds nice…but can you prove
it?
Despite
what Hollywood wants us to think, we cannot travel to the core to confirm if the
magnetic field engine idea is correct.
Instead, we build experiments that simulate the Earth to test and study the phenomena indirectly.
Meet the 3-meter Geodynamo
Experiment
A 3d depiction of the Geodynamo
experiment.
Figure credit: Laurent Hindryckx.
|
The largest experiment studying how the core makes a magnetic field is nearly 10 feet in diameter and lives in a hangar at the University of Maryland. It consists of an interior sphere, meant to represent the solid inner core, encased in a larger sphere, with 24,000 lbs of liquid sodium metal between the two, meant to represent the outer core (that's approximately the weight of 2 helicopters!). Motors on the spheres allow for each to rotate independently and copy the way the Earth spins.
So
far, the experiment has been partially successful at making an Earth-like
magnetic field, but only with extra equipment to start the process. In order to
better match real-world conditions, the entire setup is being given a
rough makeover. Right now, the inner sphere has a smooth surface, so even though the metal is flowing in a chaotic way, it is not quite
enough for the magnetic engine to
start on its own. It is like trying to strike a match against a smooth surface (or start a car without spark plugs)--we do not have the right surface to create a spark. Adding roughness to the inner sphere increases friction so the engine can turn over and start.
How rough
is rough enough?
![]() |
| The final design for the inner sphere of the 3-meter Geodynamo experiment. Each bend helps increase turbulent flow when the experiment is running. Photo and design credit: Ruben Rojas |
It is a logistical and safety challenge coordinating the modifications, but they are currently on track to be complete by summer 2020. Stay tuned!
For more information, click here.


This is a good start, but the title does not convey meaning to a general audience and the sections seem a bit disjointed. The introduction about a compass is a nice start, but needs to flow seamlessly to the Earth's magnetic field and the experimental sphere. Once there you can say something about the 20 tons of liquid sodium (and how reactive it is), but that the experiment has not yet succeeded, perhaps because of the lack of topography on the inner sphere to create turbulence (explain the term). Try to restrict yourself to two illustrations.
ReplyDeleteSticking with the first and third picture would be enough, and adding a little bit more depth about what this research helps us understand. But otherwise, excellent flow, good building of the argument!
ReplyDeleteI really liked the movement of your paper. The steps made logical sense and I had a easy time following your thinking. My one suggestion would be to round out your paper by giving it context as to why this matters to the general public.
ReplyDeleteI liked the presentation style a lot. I like the analogy of needed a match; maybe equate it to the spark plug turning over the car too? I like the friction analogy but maybe a spark plug or starter on the car would work more with the car theme?
ReplyDeleteYou had great analogies throughout that helped illustrate you points. You have a lot of figures, I think the most important ones are the third and fifth ones (the model and the rough sphere). It is really cool that all of this is happening right here at UMD!
ReplyDelete