What were the Ediacaran biota?
Almost six hundred million years before humans walked the Earth, the ocean floor was dominated by some of the earliest complex multicellular organisms, known as the “Ediacaran biota”. They first arose during the Ediacaran Period up until the beginning of the Cambrian Period, from ~600 million years ago to 538.8 million years ago. These creatures represent a diverse array of species, with a wide variety of forms, ranging from simple disc-shaped organisms to more intricate frond-like structures. They are generally characterized by their soft bodies and lack of hard parts (such as shells or skeletons), making it difficult to preserve complete specimens in the rock record. Today, Ediacaran biotas are often found in the form of impressions or molds in fine-grained sedimentary rocks. It is still a mystery as to what kind of life style these organisms maintained, but current research suggests that they could have been filter feeders, photosynthesizes, or possibly engaged in symbiotic relationships.
![]() |
| Illustration of Ediacaran animals and fossils (Source: Australia Post / Artist: Peter Trusler) |
What happened to the Ediacaran biota?
The transition between the Ediacaran and Cambrian periods is marked by the sudden disappearance of the Ediacaran biota. It is still unknown just what exactly caused the extinction of these organisms. Current hypotheses point towards environmental as well as biological causes. Clues about their lifestyle (and death) may be found by studying the rocks in which the biotas are found. Carbonate rocks that contain Ediacaran biotas, preserved as nodules and compressions, have been studied to reconstruct the amount of oxygen present during the time that these organisms lived. A recent study that did this has found that the Ediacaran biotas may have survived under low oxygen conditions. If they maintained a lifestyle that did not require oxygen, then it is possible that an increase of oxygen could be responsible for their death. Carbonate rocks during this time record a negative carbon isotope shift, which is consistent with this idea. However, recent work reconstructing the redox state during this transition has found there to be no change in the oxygen level, leading the door open for other mechanisms to cause the extinction of the Ediacaran biota.
In some locations the negative carbon isotope shift occurring at the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary is preserved in carbonate rocks that represent the falling of sea level. Additionally, higher rates of evaporation are supported by higher oxygen isotope values during this time. Sea level drop may have had negative impacts on these organisms. As the Ediacaran biota are relatively simple organisms, their bodies were made up mostly of water, so the falling of sea level would increase the salt concentration of the oceans. This would cause the fresher water contained within their bodies to diffuse out of them, essentially dehydrating and killing them.
Alternatively, studies have been done that point towards biological changes that may have resulted in the extinction of the Ediacaran biota. As the Ediacaran Period came to an end, new forms of life began to emerge. These new organisms may have engineered the ecosystem to better suit themselves, as the cost of the preexisting organisms. The Ediacaran biota lived and fed on microbial mats, essentially operating as grazers. The new organisms burrowed into the ground, disturbing microbial mats, destroying the food of the Ediacaran organisms. The inability to complete with bioturbation associated with new Cambrian organisms may have led to the extinction of the Ediacaran biota.
![]() |
| Diagram of the before (left) and after (right) the rise of bioturbation |
It is possible that environmental changes, biologic changes,
or a combination of both caused the extinction of the Ediacaran biota. Scientists
around the world are working to answer this question, but without a time machine
it is impossible to know with complete certainty what caused the Ediacaran
biota to disappear.
References
Cherry, L.B., Gilleaudeau, G.J., Grazhdankin, D.V., Romaniello,
S.J., Martin, A.J., and Kaufman, A.J., 2022, A diverse Ediacara assemblage
survived under low-oxygen conditions: Nature Communications, v. 13, p. 7306,
doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35012-y.
Darroch, S.A.F., Smith, E.F., Nelson, L.L., Craffey, M.,
Schiffbauer, J.D., and Laflamme, M., 2023, Causes and consequences of end-Ediacaran
extinction – an update: Cambridge Prisms: Extinction, p. 1–30,
doi:10.1017/ext.2023.12.


Andrew, this is a good start, but still needs to be simplified for the widest possible audience. The use of the term Ediacara biota won't likely stick with your grandmother, so I might describe these as early experiments in animals (I wanted to say multicellularity, but that seems too complex for this audience) that do not appear like any modern forms we know of. Humans are interested in how we got here, so if these were the first animals and they died it appears to be a circuitous route. If you describe what these look like (fronds, slugs, flat worms, and garlic cloves -- see the illustration) and then mention that some have remarkable fractal patterns on their surface (you would have to explain fractal to the masses) that these features might give clues to how the organisms survived, and then what might have killed them. I like describing them like air mattresses filled with water, so that the idea of more salty seawater killing them becomes more tangible. I like the discussion of various kill mechanisms as we are all facing death. The postage stamp of the living and fossilized forms is great (use the caption to move that part of the story forward), but the before and after is less clear. Trusler also has an illustration that I use for the field gear tee-shirt that would be clearer.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHi Andrew, this is a great blog post! I like how you started each paragraph with a question to guide the reader through the post. I found the explanation on what the Ediacaran biota were was very thorough and allowed me to picture what the strange organisms looked like. I agree with what was suggested in class and I think that a brief explanation on what carbon isotopes are would help make the blog a little more accessible. Overall this is a great post.
ReplyDeleteHey Andrew! Great post, the title is very appealing and mysterious like a sci-fi! Along with the suggestions made by the other comments, I think your blog could benefit from more up-close photos of the ediacaran biota. There are some gnarly specimens so they would be very eye-catching and could help keep your audience's attention.
ReplyDeleteHey Andrew, I think you effectively communicated the current insights and "mysteries" that remain on the extinction. Wondering how can a better understanding of how these organisms perished improve our outlook on the survival of present-day organisms? In other words, do we need to worry about why the Ediacaran biota perished, or is figuring out the main reasons behind their demise something that "stands on its own"?
ReplyDeleteAnother comment- I think keeping certain words like nodules or compressions is fine, as long as you accompany them with explanatory images. Nice work
ReplyDelete