![]() |
| First view of the Tharsis Montes from Mariner 9. The poor image quality is due to a global dust storm that was occurring at the probe's arrival. |
Martian volcanoes were confirmed to exist in the early 1970s, from pictures taken by the Mariner 9 orbiter. These first images revealed massive shield volcanoes, like Hawaii on Earth but taller than Mount Everest and wider than Ohio. One of the first observations was that three of these larger volcanoes, the Tharsis Montes, exist in a straight line, each separated by about 750 km. Rather than a volcanic chain like Hawaii, the line of the Tharsis Montes appears to be related to a rifting feature, but why are they spaced with a certain distance?
![]() |
| Topographic map of the Tharsis province. |
My research focuses on the
processes occurring beneath the surface of Mars that result in the spacing of
volcanoes. Specifically I am looking at the role of permeability barriers and
decompaction channels in the Martian lithosphere. As hot mantle melt rises up
into the Martian lithosphere it cools and crystallizes out in the surrounding rock
matrix. At a certain horizon, the crystals will clog the matrix preventing
further upwards movement. This horizon is the permeability barrier. Melt from
below continues to rise up until it encounters the barrier. Pressure builds as
the melt accumulates, so a horizon of high porosity is forced open below the
barrier, like air forcing a balloon to expand. This is the decompaction channel.
I use the alphaMELTS computer
program to simulate this process. Starting with an estimate of mantle
composition, the virtual material is brought up from great depth, where it melts
from decompression. When the material reaches the bottom of the lithosphere the
melt continues to rise and the crystallization is simulated. The minimum depth
of the permeability barrier is assumed to be where the crystallization rate is
a maximum.
Permeability barriers and
decompaction channels have been studied in terms of mid ocean ridges on Earth.
The slope of the mid ocean ridge combined with the barrier and channel focus a
large region of melt to the ridge axis. On Mars a similar focusing could be
occurring which would focus melt below surface volcanoes. The act of crystallization
actually releases heat, which would allow melt to rise above the normal
permeability barrier layer, like thermal erosion. Anywhere in the layer that is
a little thermally eroded would focus melt to that point, increasing the
erosion rate there. The overall instability of the layer would have a preferred
wavelength due to the balance of barrier rise and melt supply rate. This
instability is to be modeled in two and three dimensions and compared to the
actual distribution of volcanoes on the surface of Mars.




This is a nice introduction to your research topic, and the opening paragraph is quite accessible to the general audience. After that however the language falls back into the discipline terms that need metaphors or analogies to explain these terms to the common man.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting. How common is this in other places? It seems like there are three volcanoes in a row and you are trying to show that there is a simple explanation. Is there actually evidence that is what is happening on mars, besides the "line"?
ReplyDeleteThis is really the first time that the permeability barrier model has been applied to a body other than the Earth. Ideally when a three dimensional model is made it will show not just the line but also recreate how the other volcanoes are spaced out, like Olympus Mons out to the west. I focus on the line of the Tharsis Montes because that is the easiest to visualize how there is a characteristic spacing between the volcanoes.
DeleteAs for evidence I can just say that we have these volcanoes that have some spacing and is not caused by plate tectonics so some other process must be at work. The simplest alternative idea is that each volcano represents a different plume, but that idea starts getting more unrealistic as you look at smaller, closer volcanoes.
Hey Joe- as already mentioned, reword a few things in common terms to make it understandable to most people. I think it would be good to annotate the graph that you made in MELTS - maybe redo the y axis so it shows depth and clearly label what the permeability layer is, just to make the graph more readable.
ReplyDeleteJoe, cool research overall. I won't restate other people's comments. My main thought--is the third figure of the simulation necessary? General public is pretty visually driven, but I think the other three pictures add more to the story and removing it may not take away much, or at least it doesn't for me.
ReplyDeletei think the previous comments with hit the nail on the head
ReplyDelete