A watershed is the region of land
within which rain and surface water flows into a common drainage. We live in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, a large
and well-studied area that covers 64,000 km2 and includes parts
of Delaware, Maryland, New York, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West
Virginia. Currently, 17 million people and
(185 million livestock) live here. And thanks
to urbanization and land use change needed to support all of us, the watershed
has begun to break down.
Over the last few centuries, we have significantly changed
the natural state of the land in this region.
Areas that were once forested are now farmland or are filled with roads,
houses and parking lots. All of that construction and farming
brings with it substantial waste in the form of sediment, pollutants, and an
overabundance of nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus. So where does a lot of it go? You guessed it—our rivers, streams, and,
eventually, the Bay. Most of our urban waterways
are not places I want to go for a swim or even walk next to!
In addition to the
typical pollutants we tend to associate with populated areas—industrial
chemicals, heavy metals, vehicle exhaust—we also use a lot of road salt in the
winter in this region. Gotta get to work
on a snowy day, right? You don’t want to
slip and fall on an icy sidewalk either.
If you never thought about where the salt goes once everything melts…yikes! The figure below shows what has happened to
salt (chloride in this graphic) in Baltimore waterways recently.
So what are we doing to fix
everything that is broken in Chesapeake Bay Watershed? A LOT!
Policies are in place to reduce nutrient loads entering our rivers from farms and cities. Education efforts
from elementary schools to town hall meetings teach people about these problems
and some of the solutions. Stormwater
management is considered on any new building site. And the scientific community is part of a large, concerted effort to work toward solutions that will benefit future generations.
My personal interest is in what we can do to help out urban streams. Many
streams are candidates for “restoration” in order to stabilize their banks
to reduce erosion, add engineered structures to slow down the water, or
reconnect streams with their floodplains through the creation of wetlands. These are all designed to be functional and aesthetically pleasing, But restorations can be expensive, so we have to
consider a lot of questions to determine if we are spending our dollars
wisely:
·
Are restorations successfully changing the
chemistry of the water?
·
How much improvement can we expect?
·
How long will it take?
·
What are the best practices?
·
Where are they most effective?
We take part in long-term monitoring and
frequent sampling of water upstream and downstream of where a restoration
strategy has been put it in place. We analyze the water chemistry in a lab to measure any seasonal differences, changes
between normal flow conditions and storm events, and any identify entry of
pollutants and nutrients from sources we can’t see. You might have been thinking that a watershed is just affected
by what happens at the surface. We wish it was so simple! We have to consider a complicated, dynamic
system underground and all of the changes that occur through time. This is especially true in urban areas. All of the broken, leaky
pipes and sewer systems are now part of the watershed and are potential problem
areas. Even if you don't live in a city, remember that everything is connected.
We have a long way to go to
identify how much damage has been done and how we can make improvements. This is not just a regional or local
issue. It is a global consideration on
the level of climate change. Water is a
necessity for life. People aren’t moving
away from our nation’s waterways anytime soon, so we have to learn how to coexist
and create sustainable communities. Help
solve the problems locally and surf your watershed to
find out about efforts in your own area. A broken watershed can’t fix itself.

Much more of a rewrite than an edit of the first draft, but I think it is a little better. Some formatting issues that I couldn't seem to fix with margins/alignment. Still may have "set the stage" too much but I tried to relate back to the title a little more regularly.
ReplyDeleteNice overall. I'd lose the graph though.
ReplyDeleteNice overall. I'd lose the graph though.
ReplyDelete