Nitrogen is the most abundant element in Earth’s atmosphere, yet
millions of dollars are spent manufacturing nitrogen-based fertilizer every
year. What drives this lucrative industry?
The answer is the form in which atmospheric nitrogen resides. Nearly 80% of the atmosphere is composed of N2
gas, which is unavailable to most land plants.
Nitrogen is a vital nutrient for biological organisms, and therefore plant
growth tends to be limited by nitrogen in most natural environments. Some plants have formed alliances with certain
families of bacteria (i.e. Rhizobium),
which possess key enzymes used to ‘fix’ N2 into biologically available
forms such as NOx (NO2, NO3) and NH4,
to harvest nitrogen from the sky. Some forms of algae, such as Cyanobacteria can also fix nitrogen as
well. But for the majority of plants, nitrogen is only available as a recycled
organic matter – broken down leaves, wood, or animal scat. For the entire
history of plants, nitrogen-fixing organisms controlled the abundance of bio-available nitrogen in the world, and whole ecosystems organized around the principle of
recycling. Agricultural fields played by the same rules, and farmers had to
carefully recycle crop and animal waste in order conserve nutrients in the
soil.
![]() |
Vitousek et al. (1997) Comparative timing of a number of global changes. Alterations to the global nitrogen cycle are on par with deforestation, population growth, and Carbon Dioxide release.
|
Haber Bosh process
N2
+ 3H2 à 2NH3
Things have changed recently. Without enzymes,
nitrogen fixation takes a lot of energy and combustion
engines in cars and coal fired power plants regularly reach temperatures hot enough
to transform significant amounts of N2 into NOx. The
nitrogen fixed from these processes is usually deposited near its source
(roads, parking lots), or concentrated in areas downwind of coal plants. The invention of the Haber-Bosch process, which
uses energy from oil, rather than enzymes to fix N2 into NH3,
harnessed nitrogen in a way that cars and coal did not. This invention revolutionized
agriculture and increased crop yields across the world by as much as 30% in a period
of agricultural history ironically coined the “Green Revolution”. The vast toll of this prosperity for
ecosystems is still being realized today. Human activities have doubled the rate of
nitrogen fixation globally1, so much that this limiting nutrient has
become over-abundant in agricultural fields and some forests. Where more is added than plants and soil can
absorb, nitrogen has leached into waterways at alarming rates tipped the
delicate chemical balance of many estuary ecosystems. In the past twenty years, efforts to restore
estuaries and watersheds have curbed some agricultural nitrogen application, but
a problem of this magnitude will undoubtedly take a long time to resolve
because the only way to permanently remove nitrogen, is via a slow microbial
process entitled denitrification. Scientists such as myself have dedicated careers to studying the controls on this elusive process, and are working to determine ways to enhance the natural ability of ecosystems to permanently remove nitrogen from waterways.
Denitrification
2 NO3− + 10 e− + 12 H+ à N2 + 6 H2O
Measuring nitrogen removal via denitrification
in groundwater near streams, where nitrate concentrations are high and
anaerobic microbes can convert NO3- back into N2
gas. We use a stable isotope tracer to determine the rate of N2 production in stream banks and created wetlands to identify "hot spots" of nitrogen removal in coastal watersheds.
Citations
Vitousek, P.M. et al. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle:
sources and consequences. Ecological Applications 7, 737-750 (1997).


I thought you did a very good job keeping the terminology very basic and explaining the big picture, but I feel like it would be better to explain why it is important at the beginning instead of scattered throughout the blog.
ReplyDelete-Great title!
ReplyDelete-Good job setting up the topic in the first paragraph.
-Start the second paragraph with how agriculture was changed with the invention of the Haber-Bosch process, to tie in better with the end of the first paragraph.
-I like how you end the post by relating it to your research, with the picture from your field work.
-The equations are distracting and unnecessary.
-The writing could benefit from another round of editing to tighten up a couple of the sentences.